San Soucri's Politics

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

American Foreign Policy: Part I

This will be the first post of several, though not in succession, regarding American Foreign Policy.

I was recently looking through some of my old books from college and came across William Fulbright’s “The Arrogance of Power”. I decided I would pop it open and read several chapters. I also find it interesting to read works written years, even decades ago, to get a feel for what life was like, as well as what predictions people had for the future. Anyways, I came across two passages that stuck out.

“Power tends to confuse itself with virtue and a great nation is peculiarly susceptible to the idea that its power is a sign of God’s favor, conferring upon it a special responsibility for other nations – to make them richer and happier and wiser, to remake them, that is, in its own shining image.”

I believe that with the current situation in Iraq this quote, albeit written 41 years ago, has significant meaning.

I hate to argue over the fact that this nation is at war in Iraq. I believe we must accept that and move on to how victory can be achieved. But this quote spells out the flaws by which the current administration believed heading to Iraq was right.

The Bush Administration felt that it was the duty and responsibility of the United States to take on the Hussein dictatorship in an effort to establish a free and Democratic society in the heart of the Arab Street. What the quote above offers about our current situation is that the United States, as the world’s sole military superpower, believed it was right in changing the political makeup of a nation.

The United States, and its leaders, must realize that political revolution does not come from outside the state, but rather from within the hearts and souls of those living in a particular nation. If the people lack the will or readiness to revolt against their particular leaders and governmental makeup, a foreign nation cannot force that will.

Our foreign policy must be benevolent in nature, but realistic in its means. The perceived ends may look enjoyable, but when dealing with other nations it is generally the will of the people who will dictate the outcomes regarding the formations of their government.

Thought it may be too late to right the means by which we entered Iraq, I hope future Presidents will learn from the experience of Iraq: Know who you are dealing with- Understand their history-Read their religious text-Make sure they are ready for change-And most of all never assume.

The second quote is…

“What I do fear is that she (The United States) may be drifting into commitments which, though generous and benevolent in intent, are so far-reaching as to exceed even America’s great capacities”


*I do understand what Sen. Fulbright stood for while serving in the Senate, but I find his words mentioned above telling of our time and situation.

7 Comments:

Blogger Dick said...

Congrats, you've made my sidebar.

4:29 PM  
Blogger Gracchi said...

Good post. The difficulty with power is it distorts what you think you ought to do and what you can do. I wonder about the Bush administration's judgement of how powerful it actually was. My own view is that they misjudged waht they could do.

5:23 PM  
Blogger San Soucri said...

They did misjudge what then can do.

They should have stayed in Afgahnistan, which is something they could work on.

If they has stayed in Afgahistan, found and killed Bin Laden, the Bush Administration could have gone anywhere in the name of the War on Terrori, but they jumped the gun.

Now we are over stretched and fighting the wrong battles

10:39 PM  
Blogger Joe said...

san Soucri I find you have a distinct lack of history in your anaysis. Quoting Fulbright as you indicate at the end of the post is no way to gain support for your position. He stod for little that was in America's best interest, and is the standard bearer for the hate-America wing of the Democratic Party.

Second, are involvement in Iraq is a direct result of the First Gulf War and Hussein's failure to live up to the cease fire provisions. Our primary goal was to rid a menace. Now I will grant the main fear was a disruption of the oil supply should Hussein again make war, but that is not an agreement that the war in Iraq was 'blood for oil".

To think any administration would just try for regime change for its sake shows a lack of historical knowledge and reality -- such regimes exist all over, and we do nothing about them.

Our grounds for going to war were not good, the conduct of the war has been poor, but let us not fool ourselves about the motive.

11:23 AM  
Blogger San Soucri said...

Hooiser Boy

It is not that I believe in what Sen. Fulbright was as a United States Senator, it is more what those words meant.

The current Administration sent many a reason for going to war with Iraq. One of them being to over throw a government run by a brutal dictator in order to establish a democracy in the heart of Arab street.

I agree with you third paragraph, which is means for President's to be honest about why we enter other nations.

President Bush shouted it from the top of the mountains that we were trying to save the people of Iraq and bring to Democracy. When in reality it was economics that lead us to that point.

There are other dictators in the wolrd and by no means should the United States overthrow them, unless they have threatened our interests (economics, security).

Our government must be honest with itself about why we go to war for it to be honest with the American public. It must also be realistic when planning such wars.

1:11 PM  
Blogger San Soucri said...

The last quote is there as a warning to the future.

If we can win in Iraq (which we are there because other reasons stated by the President than that of the 1st Iraq War) then we can look to other avenues of which to provide benevolance.

But, if we remain in Iraq, while trying to deal with other nations such as Iran and N. Korea, which may require military action; our resources will be stretched to the point in ineffectiveness.

Sen. Fulbright may have been a member of the hate America left, but I use his words to look at the current situation we are in, not as a member of the hate-America left.

1:22 AM  
Blogger San Soucri said...

Reasons we are there...As provided by George W. Bush

-Nuclear Weapons Threat
-Economic Interests
-Over throw Saddam Hussein
-Establish Democratic State in Middle East

The failure to adhere to cease fire provisions resulted in Clinton bombing Iraq whenever he dipped into morally questionable behavior. Not reasons for Second Gulf War.

1:27 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home